BVR's Guide to Fair Value in Shareholder Dissent, Oppression and Marital Dissolution

This page is for demo purposes only, and some links aren't turned on. If you are a subscriber please login. To purchase this guide and start your subscription click here.

Preview the Table of Contents & Excerpt from BVR's Guide to Fair Value in Shareholder Dissent, Oppression and Marital Dissolution

This guide was created as a feature-enhanced PDF so you can use extra tools such as bookmarking pages, highlighting and note-taking. To download the PDF, click on the cover image or title. Please note, you may need to use the free Digital Reader download to enable some functions of the enhanced-feature PDF. Visit for more information.

For a list of links to full texts of court case opinions related to Fair Value Dissent and Oppression, click on the heading below.

Fair Value



Statutory Fair Value of Real Estate Holding Co. Includes Transaction Costs, Taxes

Brynwood Co. v. Schweisberger, 2009 WL 2218728 (Ill. App. 2 Dist.)(July 23, 2009)(unpublished) Several professional tenants in a commercial office formed a C corporation to purchase the property in 1979. The owner of an accounting firm took a lead interest (26%), served on the board of directors, and provided the company’s accounting services until he retired in 1996. The remaining shareholders’ interests ranged from 11% to 14%. The company owned and operated the building as its sole asset for nearly twenty-five years when the directors considered converting to an S corporation, primarily to avoid double taxation (at the corporate and shareholder level). The board also discussed selling the building and dissolving the company. The building was appraised five times, with values ranging from $850,000 to $1.43 million. In 2000, the company repurchased the shares of two non-tenant owners at $42.50 per share. During the next year, it offered to repurchase the interests of all non-tenant owners, including the retired accountant, for $48.50 to $50.00 per share. Click here to read the rest of this abstact.

Feedback? Email -

Bonus article by Douglas K. Moll: Shareholder Oppression and “Fair Value”: Of Discounts, Dates, AND Dastardly Deeds in the Close Corporation

The doctrine of shareholder oppression protects a close corporation minority investor from the improper exercise of majority control. When a minority shareholder establishes “oppressive”majority conduct, a court typically orders the majority to purchase the minority’s stock at its “fair value.” But what does fair value mean? Further, when is fair value to be measured? The questions are critical ones that affect the lives of countless close corporation investors and that generate an enormous amount of present-day litigation. This Article builds a case for defining fair value as enterprise value in the shareholder oppression context. The Article argues, in other words, that the buyout remedy should provide an oppressed minority investor with his pro rata share of the company’s overall value, with no reductions (or “discounts”) for the lack of control or liquidity associated with the minority’s shares. Moreover, the Article suggests that, in many situations, courts should allow an oppressed shareholder to choose between the “date of filing”and the “date of oppression”as the appropriate valuation date.

Click here to download this article
  Fair Value In The News
Note: News feeds are automated and not screened for accuracy or applicability
Titan Pharmaceuticals Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2014 Financial ... - CNNMoney
Levy Acquisition Corp.: A Hot Taco At A Not So Loco Valuation - Seeking Alpha (registration)
Still Overvalued In Its Final Week, Great Northern Iron Should Fall To $7 (GNI) - Seeking Alpha (registration)
Fair Valuations On Minority Member Exit From A BVI Company - Mondaq News Alerts (registration)
The BVI Advantage: Benefits Of A BVI Business Company - Mondaq News Alerts (registration)
  Fair Value In The BVWire
Louisiana has revised its appraisal statute in the course of other sweeping changes to the state’s business corporation statute. The previous law had been in effect for more than 40 years. The new law, the Louisiana Business Corporations Act, took effect January 1 and is based on the Model...
Issue #149-3

Much of the valuation community’s attention in the past few months has focused on New York fair value proceedings. Now the Utah Supreme Court adds more fodder to the discussion with a decision that rejects the lower court’s reliance on precedent that prohibits deductions for lack of marketability...
Issue #149-2

In a previous BVWire, commenting on the AriZona business dissolution case, Gil Matthews (Sutter Securities Inc.) made the statement that "a company structured as an S corp cannot be worth less than it would be if it were a C corp." This is due to the different tax structures and excess compensation...
Issue #147-3

Rigorous analysis of and insight into the Delaware Court of Chancery’s view of BV methodologies and techniques is available in a new special report, Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel. Business appraisers and attorneys recognize this court as the source of many of...
Issue #146-1

How do you rationalize a $12 million personal goodwill claim when you already receive compensation for signing a consulting and noncompete agreement? This was the issue explored in a recent ruling in a dissenting shareholder case. Valuation follows price: An advertising company was embroiled in...
Issue #145-4

  Fair Value In The Blogs
Note: Blog feeds are automated and not screened for accuracy or applicability
There was an error reading this XML feed...

Copyright © 2015 Business Valuation Resources, LLC. All rights reserved.
(503) 291-7963   Privacy Policy   Top of Page

Accessed: Tuesday, 3/31/2015 11:02:24 AM.