In re Marriage of Blazer

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 25, 2009

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,284 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5148 Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
424480 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers
marital dissolution/divorce
double dip
In re Marriage of Blazer
176 Cal. App. 4th 1438
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
C. Michael McClure, C. Michael McClure, Jamet Simmonds, Janet Simmonds, Lowell H. Sucherman, Lowell H.Sucherman, Michelene Insalaco, Michelene Insalaco
unnamed
McAdams

Summary

California appellate court declines to adopt the prohibition against “double- dipping” in divorce.
In re Marriage of Blazer
PDF, Size: 232 KB

See Also

California Considers the ‘Double Dip’ in Divorce—and Declines to Make New Law

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2010

California appellate court declines to adopt the prohibition against “double- dipping” in divorce.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition